The Constitutional Affairs Committee today voted by 20 votes to 4 (with no abstentions) to reform the electoral procedure of the European Parliament. The plenary vote will be in June.
The initiative uses for the first time the European Parliament's new powers under the Treaty of Lisbon to initiate a change in the treaties.
The rapporteur Andrew Duff (UK/ALDE) believes that while Lisbon strengthened the statutory authority of Parliament it did too little to tackle its popular legitimacy. He argues that a radical change in electoral procedure will increase turnout, enhance the European dimension of the election campaigns, personalise the election campaign and galvanise the development of the European political parties.
The Committee also wishes to respond to the current situation in which the allocation of seats in the House contravenes the Treaty principle of degressive proportionality.
The main features of the Duff Report are as follows:
Reacting to the vote, Andrew DUFF said: "MEPs from all the main party groups have reached a strong consensus on the need to reform Parliament. Under the proposed scheme, the next European elections in 2014 will take on a genuine European dimension. The opportunity of using a second vote for transnational MEPs should galvanise voters who have come to recognise that national political parties no longer work to sustain European integration in an efficient or democratic way".
The introduction of transnational lists will turn the existing EU parties - not allowed to campaign for voters or seats so far - into real campaigning organisations. Their candidates will be seeking support and recruiting members even in those states where they lack national political affiliates.
The 25 candidates of the transnational list will be, with all probability, leading European politicians or celebrities from other walks of life, helping to give the election campaign a wider following. "I have no objection to celebrities in politics," says Duff. "There is no reason to doubt that the political parties will choose their candidates responsibly".
Frequently Asked Questions
Won't national political parties be against the proposals? "If we really want a successful post-national parliamentary democracy, Europe's political class has to move with the times. So far national politicians have been rather bad at connecting citizens with the EU. It will not be acceptable for those national politicians who are so critical of the European Parliament to refuse to contemplate its reform".
Won't small countries be at a disadvantage? "Under Lisbon, MEPs now represent citizens and parties and not states. Voters from large and small countries will have the option of supporting a candidate of another nationality ‑ and my guess is that many will do so. That's the essence of post-national Europe."
LINKS:
Procedure file
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/file.jsp?id=5806882
La Une - Andrew Duff on electoral reform
Andrew Duff
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/members/expert/alphaOrder/view.do?language=EN&id=4514
AFCO
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/committees/homeCom.do?language=EN&body=AFCO